How Difficult Is it to Pass a Social Security Continuing Disability Re-Evaluation (CDR)?
Social Security must abide by the CDR rules, which require you to show medical improvement and an ability to work.
After you are approved for disability benefits, the Social Security Administration (SSA) will conduct a continuing disability review (CDR) every few years to see if your condition has improved. (In most cases, your CDR will occur every three years, but if you are over 55 or if you have a condition that is unlikely to get better, your CDR will occur every seven years. A CDR can also be triggered if you begin earning too much money from working (the SSA checks whether you are making over the SGA amount during periodic "redeterminations"), unless you are enrolled in a return-to-work plan for disability recipients. For more, see how often disability reviews happen.)
If you face a medical CDR, your case will be sent to the Disability Determination Service (DDS) in your area, where your case will undergo a process similar to when you first applied for disability. A claims examiner at DDS will review any new medical evidence added to your file since the time of your initial approval and may require you to undergo an examination with a doctor hired by the SSA.
CDR Standard for Denying Benefits
What could cause an individual to "fail" their Social Security disability re-evaluation? Your disability benefits can be taken away only if the evidence shows that:
- you have had medical improvement "as it relates to your ability to work," and
- you have the ability to engage in substantial gainful activity ("SGA," usually defined as earning at least $1,130 per month from working).
Medical improvement. The main test used in the CDR is the medical improvement review standard (MIRS). Your condition must show medical improvement--that is, the severity of your impairment(s) must have lessened (and the medical improvement must also be related to your disabling impairment, not just to any condition you have). There are a couple of situations that indicate an individual has had medical improvement. The claims examiner could determine you have medically improved after reviewing your current medical records or the examiner could say you have had medical improvement if you have returned to regular employment.
"Related to your ability to work." Not only must the claims examiner find that your disabling condition has medically improved, but he or she must also find that the improvement is related to your work; in other words, that it has resulted in an increase in your residual functional capacity (RFC).
To determine this, the examiner will compare your current RFC to your prior RFC. For example, suppose you were approved for disability based on chronic back pain that prevented you from sitting for more than a half an hour at a time, and at the time you were given an RFC of "less than sedentary work." After a successful spinal fusion, your ability to sit was increased to four hours, so can now do some types of sedentary work. The SSA would consider this medical improvement "related to your ability to work."
On the other hand, suppose you were first approved for disability based on painful edema in your legs that limited your ability to sit or stand to less than six hours. Following a weight loss regime, your pain decreased, and the SSA found your condition medically improved. However, because you still could not sit or stand for more than six hours, your RFC did not change, and your benefits would continue because you have the same work-related restrictions.
The ability to do SGA. Even if the SSA finds that you have experienced medical improvement as it relates to your ability to work, the SSA must also find that you can work at the SGA level before ending your benefits. To make this decision, the SSA will consider both your original impairments and any new restrictions you have developed since your initial approval for disability.
Exceptions to the Medical Improvement Standard
The SSA does not need to show that your impairment has medically improved if:
- you are working over the SGA level
- you have had vocational training that makes it possible for you to return to work (for example, your RFC limited you to sedentary work and you are now qualified for sedentary work because of a class you took)
- a new method for evaluating the severity of your condition shows you are not disabled, or
- there was an error in the initial determination and you should not have been found disabled (for example, clear evidence was found in your file that shows you didn't qualify for disability, or new evidence clearly refutes prior evidence that you were disabled).
In these cases (called Group I Exceptions), the examiner does not need to find medical improvement in your case. However, the examiner still must find that you are not currently disabled to deny you benefits; that is, that you are capable of performing substantial gainful activity.
Exceptions to Being Capable of Performing SGA
But sometimes the SSA can stop benefits after a CDR even without having to show that you can engage in SGA. The examiner can use these exceptions to the regular standard of review (called Group II Exceptions) to stop your benefits if you:
- committed fraud
- failed to cooperate with the disability review
- can't be found, or
- failed to follow the doctor's prescribed treatment.
CDR for Children
- there has been medical improvement, and
- the child's impairments no longer result in “marked” or “severe” restrictions functional limitations.
Like adult recipients, these requirements are waived if there has been fraud, failure to cooperate, the location of the child is unknown, or the child has failed to follow prescribed treatment.
Alternatively, if a CDR occurs because the child has turned 18, the child will have to undergone a new determination under adult disability standards.
Your Chance of Losing Benefits
Although it is possible to lose benefits after a CDR, it is highly unlikely. In the most recent study published by the SSA, disability benefits after a CDR are continued over 95% of the time. Most individuals with impairments serious enough to be approved for disability in the first place do not medically improve, nor do they return to regular employment. However, for individuals who were approved for disability benefits based upon some type of injury or medical condition in which improvement was likely (such as a fracture), it is more likely their disability benefits may not be continued. It depends upon your impairment, the likelihood of medical improvement, and if you have returned to regular work activity.
Even if your benefits are stopped, you can appeal the decision and request that your claim be re-heard in front of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). And if you are denied benefits at your CDR, you can ask that they be continued until your hearing. However, if the hearing judge agrees with the CDR, you may have to repay these benefits. For more information, see our article on the continuation of disability benefits during appeal.